Análisis espacial de los cambios en la cobertura vegetal y conectividad estructural del paisaje del bosque de niebla en el Occidente de México

Authors

  • Edgar Gregorio Leija Loredo Centro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3142-0924
  • Manuel Eduardo Mendoza Cantú Centro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, campus Morelia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1310-9702
  • Clarita Rodríguez Soto Centro de Estudios e Investigación en Desarrollo Sustentable, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5684-1197
  • Erna López Granados Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Tierra, Departamento de Geología y Mineralogía Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3998-3019
  • Vicente Salinas Melgoza Instituto de Tecnológico del Valle de Morelia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5750-5523

Keywords:

Deforestación, Fragmentación, Patch Analyst, Parches, SVTMich

Abstract

The constant pressure of anthropogenic activities has generated that the cloud forest fragments (BN) have an island pattern surrounded by a matrix of socioeconomic activities. The conservation of this ecosystem is key due to its high biological diversity that it represents in relation to its territorial extension in Mexico and globally. The objective of this work is to analyze the changes in the vegetation cover and the structural connectivity of the BN in the 1995-2018 period in the Transversal Volcanic System of the state of Michoacán from the visual interpretation of Orthophotos and Spot satellite images. Landscape metrics were applied to later carry out their comparative analysis. The results obtained show that the BN coverage lost an area of ​​9,038 ha in 23 years, with a global deforestation rate between 1995-2018 of -1.4%. Regarding the structural connectivity, the BN was observed an increase in the number of patches, increasing from 628 in 1995 to 762 in 2018, as well as the density of patches going from 2.1 to 3.6 ha for the same period. This reflects that the BN has fragmented considerably, in addition to rapidly losing its original surface. It is essential to generate data and information that contribute to the construction of strategies that increase the connectivity of the landscape in the BN fragments, guaranteeing the survival of wild species, through actions aimed at conserving biodiversity in the long term and reducing the fragmentation and isolation of ecosystems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARONOFF, S. Geographic Information System: A Management Perspective. Ottawa: WDL Publications, 1989.

ARANBARRI J, GONZÁLEZ-SAMPÉRIZ P, IRIARTE, E., ET AL. Human–landscape interactions in the Conquezuela–Ambrona Valley (Soria, continental Iberia): from the early Neolithic land use to the origin of the current oak woodland. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol, 2015, Vol. 436, p. 41–57.

ARROYO-RODRÍGUEZ, V., FAHRIG, L., TABARELLI, M., WATLING, J.I., TISCHENDORF, L., BENCHIMOL, M., CAZETTA, E., FARIA, D., LEAL, I.R., MELO, F.P.L., MORANTE-FILHO, J.C., SANTOS, B.A., ARASA-GISBERT, R., ARCE-PEÑA, N., CERVANTES-LÓPEZ, M.J., CUDNEY-VALENZUELA, S., GALÁN-ACEDO, C., SAN-JOSÉ, M., VIEIRA, I.C.G., SLIK, J.F., NOWAKOWSKI, A.J., TSCHARNTKE, T. Designing optimal human-modified landscapes for forest biodiversity conservation. Ecology Letters, 2020, Vol. 23, p. 1404–1420.

BAKKER, J.D. Y WILSON, S.D. Using ecological restoration to constrain biological invasion. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, Vol. 41, p. 1058-1064.

BOTEQUILHA, L.A., MILLER, J., AHERN, J., MCGARIGAL, K. Measuring Landscapes. A Planner´s Handbook. Island press. Washington. 2006.

BAUHUS, J., VAN DER MEER, P. & KANNINEN, M. Ecosystem goods and services from plantation forests. BAUHUS, J., VAN DER MEER, P., & KANNINEN, M. (eds.). Routledge, 2010.

BUBB, P., MAY, I., MILES, L., SAYER, J. Cloud Forest Agenda. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK, 2010. Disponible en internet: http://www.unep-wcmc.org/resources/publications/UNEP_WCMC_bio_series/20.htm

BRECKHEIMER, I., HADDAD, N.M., MORRIS, W.F., TRAINOR, A.M., FIELDS, W.R., JOBE, R.T., HUDGENS, A., MOODY, A., WALTERS, J.R. Defining and evaluating the umbrella species concept for conserving and restoring landscape connectivity. Conservation. Biology, 2014, Vol. 28, p. 1584-1593.

BUENO, A.S., & PERES, C.A. Patch-scale biodiversity retention in fragmented landscapes: Reconciling the habitat amount hypothesis with the island biogeography theory. Journal of Biogeography, 2019, Vol. 46, N°3, p. 621-632. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13499.

CHALLENGER, A. Conceptos generales acerca de los ecosistemas templados de montaña de México y su estado de conservación. En: O. SÁNCHEZ, E. VEGA, E. PETERS Y O. MONROY-VILCHIS. (eds.). Conservación de ecosistemas templados de montaña en México. Diplomado en conservación, manejo y aprovechamiento de vida silvestre. Instituto Nacional de Ecología, Semarnat, México. 2003, p. 17-44.

CONABIO. El Bosque Mesófilo de Montaña en México: Amenazas y Oportunidades para su Conservación y Manejo Sostenible. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. México D.F., México, 2010, p. 197.

CORREA-AYRAM, C.A., MENDOZA, M.E., LÓPEZ-GRANADOS, E. Análisis del cambio en la conectividad estructural del paisaje (1975-2008) de la cuenca del lago Cuitzeo, Michoacán, México. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 2014, Vol. 59, p. 7-23.

CORREA-AYRAM, C.A., MENDOZA, M.E., ETTER, A., PÉREZ-SALICRUP, D.R. Habitat connectivity in biodiversity conservation: A review of recent studies and applications. Progress in Physical Geography, 2016, Vol. 40, N°1, p. 7-37.

CORREA-AYRAM, C., MENDOZA, M. E., ETTER, A., & PÉREZ-SALICRUP, D. R. Anthropogenic impact on habitat connectivity: a multidimensional human footprint index evaluated in a highly biodiverse landscape of Mexico. Ecological Indicators, 2017, Vol. 72, p. 895-909. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.007

CORREA-AYRAM, C., MENDOZA, M. E., ETTER, A., PÉREZ-SALICRUP, D. R. Effect of the landscape matrix condition for prioritizing Multi-Species Connectivity Conservation in a Highly Biodiverse Landscape of Central Mexico. Regional Environmental Change, 2019, Vol. 19, N°1, p. 149-163.

CARVAJAL, M.A., ALANIZ, A.J., SMITH-RAMÍREZ, C., SIEVING, K.E., SYPHARD, A. Assessing habitat loss and fragmentation and their effects on population viability of forest specialist birds: linking biogeographical and population approaches. Diversity and Distributions, 2018, Vol. 24, p. 820-830.

DEL CASTILLO, R.F. A conceptual framework to describe the ecology of fragmented landscapes and implications for conservation and management. Ecological Applications, 2015, Vol. 25, p. 1447–1455.

CASTILLO, L. S., CORREA-AYRAM, C., SERRANO, F., CHALÁN, L. ET AL. Cobertura de áreas protegidas y conectividad ecorregional en los países andinos tropicales. III Congreso de Áreas Protegidas de Latinoamérica y el Caribe. 2020.

ESRI. Environmental Systems Research Institute. Cómo funciona. Estadísticas focalizadas. Recuperado de http://desktop.arcgis.com/es/arcmap/10.3/tools/spatial-analyst-toolbox/how-focal-statisticsworks.htm, 2016.

FAHRIG, L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity». Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2003, Vol. 34, p. 487-515.

FAHRIG, L. Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis. Journal of Biogeography, 2013, Vol. 40, p. 1649–1663.

FAHRIG, L. Ecological responses to habitat fragmentation per se. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2017, Vol. 48, p. 1–23.

FAO. Forest resources assessment 1990. Survey of tropical Forest cover and study of change processes. FAO forestry paper 130. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Roma, Italia. Disponible en: http://www.fao.org/3/w0015e/W0015E00.htm

FERRARI, L., OROZCO-ESQUIVEL, T., MANEA, V., & MANEA, M. The dynamic history of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt and the Mexico subduction zone. Tectonophysics, 2012, Vol. 522-523, p. 122-149.

FAO. El estado de los bosques del mundo. Las vías forestales hacia el desarrollo sostenible. Roma. Licencia: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. 2018.

FAO Evaluación de los recursos forestales mundiales 2020. Principales resultados. Roma. 2020. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8753es

FRA. Evaluación de los Recursos Forestales Mundiales. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Data compendium. Rome. 2015, p. 253. Available online at: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4808s.pdf

FREEMAN, B., ROEHRDANZ, P.R., PETERSON, A.T Modeling endangered mammal species distributions and forest connectivity across the humid upper Guinea lowland rainforest of west Africa. Biodiversity Conservations, 2019, Vol. 28, p. 671–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-01684-6

GUERRA, P.F. Las doce principales reglas de la interpretación fotogeológica y las bases fundamentales de que se derivan, Investigaciones Geográficas, Boletín del Instituto de Geografía, UNAM. N° 50, 2003, p. 42-66.

GONZÁLEZ-SAUCEDO, Z.Y., GONZÁLEZ-BERNAL, A. & MARTÍNEZ-MEYER, E. Identifying priority areas for landscape connectivity for three large carnivores in northwestern Mexico and southwestern United States. Landscape Ecolology, 2021, Vol. 36, p. 877-896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01185-4

HANSKI, I., TRIANTIS, K. Habitat fragmentation and species richness. Journal of Biogeography, 2015, Vol. 42, p. 989-993. doi:10.1111/jbi.12478

INEGI. Conjunto de datos vectoriales de uso de suelo y vegetación, escala 1: 250 000, serie V (continuo nacional). Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, Aguascalientes. 2013.

KIM, D.H., SEXTON, J.O., TOWNSHEND, J.R. Accelerated deforestation in the humid tropics from the 1990s to the 2000s. Geophysical Research Letters, 2015, Vol. 42, p. 495–3501.

KOOL, J., MOILANEN, A., TREML, E. Population connectivity: recent advances and new perspectives. Landscape Ecology, 2013, Vol. 28, N°2, p. 165-185.

LAITA, A., KOTIAHO, J.S., MÖNKKÖNNEN. Graph-theoretic connectivity measures: what do they tell us about connectivity? Landscape Ecology, 2011, Vol. 26, p. 951-967.

LEIJA, E.G Y MENDOZA, M.E. Estudios de conectividad del paisaje en América Latina: retos de investigación. Madera y Bosques, 2021, Vol. 27, N°1, p. 1-27, e2712032. doi: 10.21829/myb.2021.2712032

LEIJA, E.G., PAVÓN, H.N., SÁNCHEZ-GONZÁLEZ, A., RODRÍGUEZ-LAGUNA, R., ÁNGELES-PÉREZ, G. Land cover change and carbon stores in a tropical montane cloud forest in the Sierra Madre Oriental, Mexico. Journal of Mountain Science, 2018, Vol. 15, N°10, p. 2136-2147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-4937-y

LEIJA, E.G., REYES-HERNÁNDEZ, H., REYES-PÉREZ, O., FLORES-FLORES, J.L., SAHAGÚN, F.J. Cambios en la cubierta vegetal, usos de la tierra y escenarios futuros en la región costera del estado de Oaxaca, México. Madera y Bosques, 2016, Vol. 22, N°1, p. 125-140.

LEIJA, E.G., VALENZUELA-CEBALLOS, S.I., VALENCIA-CASTRO, M., JIMÉNEZ-GONZÁLEZ, G., CASTAÑEDA-GAYTÁN, G., REYES-HERNÁNDEZ, H., MENDOZA, M.E. Análisis de cambio en la cobertura vegetal y uso del suelo en la región centro-norte de México. El caso de la cuenca baja del río Nazas. Ecosistemas, 2020, Vol. 29, N°1, p.1826.

LEIJA, E.G & PAVÓN, N.P. The northernmost tropical rain forest of the Americas: Endangered by agriculture expansion. Tropical Ecology, 2017, Vol. 58, N°3, p. 641–652.

LEIJA-LOREDO EG, REYES-HERNÁNDEZ H, FORTANELLI J, PALACIO-APONTE G. 2011. Situación actual del bosque de niebla en el estado de San Luis Potosí. Investigación y Ciencia, 2011, Vol. 53, p. 3-11.

LEÓN-PANIAGUA, L., LUNA, V.I.M., MARTÍNEZ-MORALES, A., TEJERO-DÍEZ, J.D. VI: Cuenca Alta del Balsas. En: El bosque mesófilo de montaña en México: amenazas y oportunidades para su conservación y manejo sostenible. CONABIO, México, D. F. 2010, p. 88-97.

LILESAND, T.M., KEIFFER, R. W., CHIPMAN, J. W Remote sensing and image interpretation. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. 2015.

LINDENMAYER, D.B & FISCHER, J. Landscape Change and Habitat Fragmentation: An Ecological and Conservation Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. 2006.

LINKE, S., KENNARD, M.J., HERMOSO, V. Merging connectivity rules and large-scale condition assessment improves conservation adequacy in river systems. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, Vol. 49, p. 1036–1045.

LOA, L.E., SÁNCHEZ, H.M.D., TORRES, J.J.G., ROSAS, R.O.C., SIERRA, R.M.S. Áreas prioritarias para el manejo y conservación en el estado de San Luis Potosí, México. México, SEDARH-SEGAM. 2009.

LUNA I, VELÁZQUEZ A, VELÁZQUEZ E. México. En: KAPPELLE M., BROWN A.D. (Eds.). Bosques Nublados del Neotrópico, 2001, p. 183-229, Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Heredia, Costa Rica.

MACDONALD, Z.G., ANDERSON, I.D., ACORN, J.H., & NIELSEN, S.E. Decoupling habitat fragmentation from habitat loss: butterfly species mobility obscures fragmentation effects in a naturally fragmented landscape of lake islands. Oecologia, 2018, Vol. 186, p. 11–27.

MAS, J.F. Change estimates by map comparison: A method to reduce erroneous changes due to positional error. Transactions in GIS, 2005, Vol. 9, N°4, 619-629.

MASS, M.J. Conversion of tropical dry forest to pasture and agriculture. En: BULLOK S., H. MONEY Y E. MEDINA. (Eds.). Seasonally dry tropical forests. 1995. Cambridge, Mass. Cambridge University Press.

MENDOZA-DELGADO, M. Cartografía geomorfológica y morfométrica del sistema volcánico transversal del sector occidental del estado de Michoacán. Informe de Residencias Profesionales. Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Tacámbaro. 2015. 47 p.

MCGARIGAL, K., CUSHMAN, S.A., NEEL, M.C., ENE, E. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. 2002. Disponible en internet: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html

MENDOZA, M. E., LOPÉZ, G. E., GENELETTI, D., PÉREZ-SALICRUP, D. R., & SALINAS, V. Analysing land cover and land use change processes at watershed level: A multitemporal study in the Lake Cuitzeo Watershed, Mexico (1975-2003). Apllied Geograpghy. 2011, Vol. 31, p. 237-250. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.05.010

MESSIER, C., PUETTMANN, K. J. & COATES, K. D. Managing forests as complex adaptive systems: building resilience to the challenge of global change. MESSIER, C., KLAUS, J. & PUETTMANN, K. (eds.). London, Routledge, 2013.

MITCHELL, M.G.E., BENNETT, E.M., GONZALEZ, A. Linking landscape connectivity and ecosystem service provision: current knowledge and research gaps. Ecosystems, 2013, Vol. 16, p. 894-908. 10.1007/s10021-013-9647-2

OPDAM, P., STEINGRÖVER, E., ROOIJ, S., VAN VAN ROOIJ, S., VAN ROOIJ, S. Ecological networks: a spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, Vol. 75, p. 322-332. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.015

ORTIZ-TORRES, J. Modelo de distribución de bosque mesófilo en el Sistema Volcánico Transversal de Michoacán. Tesis de Ingeniaría. Instituto Tecnológico del Valle de Morelia, 2013, p. 44.

PALACIO-PRIETO, J.L., BOCCO, G., VELÁZQUEZ, A., MAS, J.F., TAKAKI-TAKAKI, F., VICTORIA, A., LUNA-GONZÁLEZ, L., GÓMEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, G., LÓPEZ-GARCÍA, J., PALMA-MUÑOZ, M., TREJO-VÁZQUEZ, I., PERALTA-HIGUERA, A., PRADO-MOLINA, J., RODRÍGUEZ-AGUILAR, A., MAYORGA-SAUCEDO, R., GONZÁLEZ-MEDRANO, F. La condición actual de los recursos forestales en México: resultados del Inventario Forestal Nacional 2000. Investigaciones Geográficas, 2000, Vol. 43, p. 83-203.

PÉREZ-DÍAZ, S., LÓPEZ-SÁEZ, J.A., PONTEVEDRA-POMBAL, X., SOUTO-SOUTO, M., GALOP, D. 8000 years of vegetation history in the northern Iberian Peninsula inferred from the palaeoenvironmental study of the Zalama ombrotrophic bog (Basque-Cantabrian Mountains, Spain). Boreas, 2016, Vol. 45, p. 658–672.

PRICE, M.F., GRATZER, G., DUGUMA, L.A., KOHLER, T., MASELLI, D., ROMEO, R. Mountain forests in a changing world: realizing values, addressing challenges. FAO, SDC, Rome. 2011.

PUIG H. La biogeografía de las plantas del bosque mesófilo. En: SÁNCHEZ-RAMOS, G., REYES-CASTILLO, P., DIRZO, R. (eds.). Historia Natural de la Reserva de la Biosfera el Cielo. UAT, Ciudad Victoria Tamps. México. 2005.

REYES, H.H., AGUILAR-ROBLEDO, M., AGUIRRE R.J.R., TREJO V.I. (2006). Cambios en la cubierta vegetal y uso del suelo en el área del proyecto Pujal-Coy, San Luis Potosí, México. Investigaciones Geográficas, 2006, Vol. 59, p. 26-42.

RUDNICK, D, RYAN, S, BEIER, P. (2012). The role of landscape connectivity in planning and implementing conservation and restoration priorities. Issues in Ecology, 2012, Vol. 16, p. 1–20.

RZEDOWSKI, J. Vegetación de México. Limusa, México. 1978.

SÁNCHEZ-VELÁZQUEZ, L.R., RAMÍREZ-BAMONDE, E., ANDRADE-TORRES, A., RODRÍGUEZ-TORRES, P. Ecología, florística y restauración del bosque mesófilo de montaña. En: SÁNCHEZ-VELÁZQUEZ, L.R., GALINDO-GONZÁLEZ, J.R., DÍAZ-FLEISCHER, F. (eds.). Ecología, Manejo y Conservación de los Ecosistemas de Montaña en México. 2008, p. 9-49. CONABIO/Universidad Veracruzana/Editorial Mundi-Prensa México, México, Distrito Federal, México.

SAURA, S. The Habitat Amount Hypothesis implies negative effects of habitat fragmentation on species richness and occurrence. Journal of Biogeography, 2020, Vol. 48, p.11–22. doi: 10.1111/jbi.13958.

SAURA, S., BASTIN, L., BATTISTELLA, L., MANDRICI, A., DUBOIS, G. Protected areas in the world's ecoregions: how well connected are they? Ecological Indicators, 2017, Vol. 76, p. 144-158.

SAURA, S., BERTZKY, B., BASTIN, L., BATTISTELLA, L., MANDRICI, A., DUBOIS, G. Global trends in protected area connectivity from 2010 to 2018. Biological Conservation, 2019, Vol. 238, p. 108183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.028

SAURA, S., PACUAL-HORTAL, L. A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape Conservation planing: comparison with existing índices and application to a case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, Vol. 83, N°2, p. 91-103. doi: 10.1016/j.landurb-plan.2007.03.005.

SPRACKLEN, D.V., RIGHELATO, R. Tropical montane forests are a larger than expected global carbon store. Biogeosciences, 2014, Vol. 11, p. 2741–2754. doi: 10.5194/bg-11-2741-2014.

TAYLOR, D.P., FAHRIG, L., WITH, K. Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics. En: CROOKS, K.R., SANJAYAN, M. (eds.). Conservation biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006, p. 29–43.

TOLEDO-ACEVES, T., MEAVE, J.A., GONZÁLEZ-ESPINOSA, M., RAMÍREZ-MARCIAL, N. Tropical montane cloud forests: current threats and opportunities for their conservation and sustainable management in Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 2011, Vol. 92, p. 974-981.

TREJO, I., DIRZO, R. Deforestation of seasonally dry tropical forest: a national and local analysis in Mexico, Biological Conservation, 2000, Vol. 94, p. 133-142.

VILLASEÑOR, J.L. El bosque húmedo de montaña en México y sus plantas vasculares: catálogo florístico-taxonómico. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. México, D.F. 2010. p 40.

WILIAMS-LINERA G. El bosque de niebla del centro de Veracruz: Ecología, historia y destino en tiempos de fragmentación y cambio climático. CONABIO- Instituto de Ecología. Xalapa, Veracruz, México. 2007.

WRIGHT, J.S. Tropical forests in a changing Environment. Ecology and Evolution, 2005, Vol. 20, p. 553-560.

ZARCO-HERNÁNDEZ, M. Evaluación de los cambios en los patrones temporales de precipitación y temperatura en el Sistema Volcánico Transversal al Oriente de Michoacán. Informe Técnico de Residencias Profesionales. Instituto Tecnológico Superior De Tacámbaro. 2014, p. 58.

Published

2023-03-23

How to Cite

Leija Loredo, E. G., Mendoza Cantú, M. E., Rodríguez Soto, C., López Granados, E. ., & Salinas Melgoza, V. . (2023). Análisis espacial de los cambios en la cobertura vegetal y conectividad estructural del paisaje del bosque de niebla en el Occidente de México. Revista De Geografía Norte Grande, (86). Retrieved from https://teologiayvida.uc.cl/index.php/RGNG/article/view/44603

Issue

Section

Artículos